Free tool

TCF and TEF Canada practice test, under the clock

A full compréhension écrite paper for either exam, run in the real sixty minutes and marked the moment you hand it in. 4 papers, 158 questions, every answer explained. No account, no email.

60:00

39 questions, 60 minutes.

The papers come from the Français Prep course mock exams. They are written in the idiom of each exam rather than reproduced from any real paper, which no preparation service may copy. This mark does not convert into a TEF or TCF score, and it is not an NCLC level. No official table converts a practice paper, nobody can calibrate these documents against the real paper's difficulty, and anyone who offers you that equivalence invented it. Use the mark to find where you lose points, not to predict a result.

Reading is the section candidates most often assume they are fine at, because they are fine at it with unlimited time. The exam does not offer unlimited time. It offers sixty minutes for roughly forty questions across a dozen documents that get harder as they go, which works out at about ninety seconds each and means far less than that on the early ones so that there is more than that on the late ones.

So run it under the clock the first time, even though you will score worse. A paper done at leisure tells you what you can understand. A paper done in sixty minutes tells you what you can understand while deciding whether to move on, which is the thing actually being examined.

Never leave a box empty. Both exams give a point for a right answer and zero for a wrong one. There is no penalty for being wrong, so a blank costs exactly what an error costs while forfeiting the one-in-four a guess would have given you. The tool counts your blanks separately so the habit shows up in the result.

When it marks you, read the breakdown by document rather than the total. Marks are almost never spread evenly: they collapse on a particular kind of text, usually the opinion pieces and the administrative notices, and knowing which kind is the whole value of sitting a practice paper. The TCF Canada and the TEF Canada pages set out how the rest of each exam is built.

Questions

About the reading paper, under the clock

Is this practice test really free?

Yes. All 4 papers and all 158 questions work without an account, an email address or a payment. The answer key and the reasoning behind each answer are included, because a practice test whose corrections are withheld is not practice.

Does my score here tell me my NCLC level?

This mark does not convert into a TEF or TCF score, and it is not an NCLC level. No official table converts a practice paper, nobody can calibrate these documents against the real paper's difficulty, and anyone who offers you that equivalence invented it. Use the mark to find where you lose points, not to predict a result.

Then what is the mark for?

For finding where the marks go. The per-document breakdown is the part worth reading: a candidate who takes eleven of twelve on the short notices and four of nine on the opinion pieces does not have a reading problem, they have an argumentative-text problem, and those are fixed differently. A single total hides that; the breakdown is what makes the next week of study obvious.

How long should I take?

Sixty minutes, which is what the real paper allows, and the timer defaults to it. Doing the paper untimed tells you what you can understand but not what you can understand under pressure, and the gap between those two is where most candidates lose their marks.

Should I guess when I do not know?

Always. Both exams award a point for a correct answer and zero for a wrong one, with no penalty, so a blank box and a wrong box cost you exactly the same. With four options, a guess is worth a quarter of a mark on average and a blank is worth nothing. The tool counts your blanks separately for that reason.

How close is this to the real paper?

Close in structure and intent: the same question count, the same four options with one correct, the same rise in difficulty from short practical notices to opinion pieces, and documents written in the idiom the exam uses. It is not a past paper, and nobody outside the operators can calibrate difficulty exactly. Treat it as rehearsal, not as measurement.

Why is there no listening paper here?

Because it would need audio we cannot honestly supply. Building a listening test means recording French at exam pace with a single playback and no rewind, and a page of transcripts is not that. The course lessons handle listening with a protocol built on authentic free audio instead, which is the honest substitute.

Can I take the same paper twice?

You can, and the second attempt will flatter you, because you will remember answers rather than find them. If you want a clean second measurement, use the other paper for that exam. Once you have used both, the question bank lets you work through the same questions untimed and one at a time, which is a better use of a paper you have already seen.

Keep reading

NEXT STEP

Find out where your French actually stands

Book a short assessment with Adèle: one writing task, one speaking task, and an honest plan for the weeks you have left before the exam.